BALTIMORE COUNTY, Md. (WBFF) — Six former Baltimore County Council members are calling for more transparency over the $6.6 million renovation of the Rocky Point Golf Course clubhouse in Essex, renewing scrutiny of a project that moved forward even after the County Council rejected funding for it.The former council members sent a letter to the current secretary and the council demanding the release of an unredacted auditor’s report about the $6.6 million in public funds spent on the project. Former Councilman Tom Quirk, a three-term Democratic councilman who left office in 2022, is among the six who signed the letter and spoke publicly Wednesday about their demands.“I would like to see the unredacted version because I think if we saw that, that the acting county auditor gave the county council the right advice, which was not to allow this to happen and that the county counsel chose to ignore that,” Quirk said.Quirk also argued the project should not have proceeded after the council rejected the funding.“Well, it’s unlawful. If the county council doesn’t approve an appropriation for Rocky Point, the county executive cannot go back and just make it happen anyway,” Quirk said.The dispute centers on what happened after the Baltimore County Council rejected $6.6 million in funding for the planned golf course clubhouse renovation about one year ago, calling the expenditure inappropriate.Despite that vote, the money for the Rocky Point project was never eliminated from the budget, even though the council at the time unanimously agreed it should be, according to the former council members’ concerns.The project, sought by then-County Executive Johnny Olszewski and supported by his successor, Kathy Klausmeier, ultimately received funding.County Council Chair Mike Ertel said the council could seek guidance on what can be made public from the report.Councilman Julian Jones said there is a process for seeking records.“People have a right to request what they want, and certainly there’s a process in terms of a Freedom of Information Act request. There’s a process,” Jones said. “I don’t know all the things that’s in the document. I remember reading it, but I’ll tell you the truth. I don’t remember anything that was in there that was so bad that it needed to be redacted.”Quirk also pointed to the absence of an inspector general in Baltimore County, an office tasked with investigating waste, fraud and corruption in county government.“It should be an issue that should be looked into. It’s in the public’s best interest, transparency and accountability,” Quirk said.Jones said the prior effort to select an inspector general became “so politicized” that “it turned into a mess,” adding that “at some point, the prior Inspector General left and here we are without an Inspector General.”Ertel said the county has qualified staff in that office and can continue operating without a formally appointed inspector general for now.“We have highly qualified people that are in that office currently,” Ertel said.“I think they can do their jobs without an official IG right now until the voters decide whether we want an independent commission and we heard loud and clear from the voters, that that’s what they wanted,” Ertel said. “But we have to put it on the ballot for the voters to actually approve it.”