There’s No Way That NPR’s Explanation for the False Alito Retirement Article Is This Bad, Right?

image

Shortly after the Supreme Court issued its final ruling of the term, Nina Totenberg published a bogus article proclaiming that long-time conservative Justice Samuel Alito would be retiring. Just minutes after the article went live, the outlet issued a vague retraction.

Advertisement

Reporters at Townhall quickly grabbed screenshots of the article before NPR managed to strike it from the web.

The original statement regarding the retraction did not indicate what the outlet had even retracted. Readers were simply greeted with a message stating that “this story” had been removed. NPR editor-in-chief Thomas Evans then released a statement claiming that the article was published due to a “misunderstanding” without elaborating on what that could possibly mean.

After seemingly realizing that the explanation raised more questions than answers, NPR reporters went deeper on the explanation: Nina Totenberg somehow misheard Chief Justice John Roberts announcing retirements and believed that Alito would be stepping down. The outlet claims that they rushed to publish the article rather than check with Alito’s office or the Supreme Court’s Public Information Office.

Recommended

Advertisement

In a release issued by NPR, an executive claimed that they rushed to report the news due to the gravitas of Totenberg’s prior reporting. They claim that they do not wait for confirmation when she reports a SCOTUS development.

“Totenberg is one of the most experienced reporters covering the Supreme Court,” the release stated. “She’s done so for NPR since 1975. Her status contributed to the error.”

The fishy story has given readers the impression that there’s far more to this story than what NPR is willing to tell.